6 November 2022

Dance Slow Motion


See if you agree, but I thought there was something compulsive about this. Once the dance had started I just could not take my eyes off it.  I guess it may be because when you normally see street dance then things happen so quickly you simply don’t get a chance to take in what is going on.  Add a little Tai Chi style movement in to the dance and it can be even more perplexing - plus the fact the dancer is not as stick thin as the guys who normally do this (is there a little Blues Brothers going on here?) adds to the overall entrancement.

So, stand up Thai TV editor Sawang Treetippitak who created this with his trusty Canon T3i / 600D. The rest is just open-mouthed, drop-jawed history. Go Sawang!

17 January 2016

The Boy with a Camera for a Face


This modern day parable says an awful lot about the way many of us live our lives today.  A boy is born but instead of a face he has a camera.  He inadvertently records every moment of his life and, as you will see, this has its ups and downs.  Written and directed by Spencer Brown and brilliantly narrated by Steven Berkoff this is both the story of a boy and a culture all at once.

11 September 2011

Bokeh for Beginners

It is one of those words bandied about by photographers and it is too often assumed that people actually know what is meant when someone says that they love the bokeh of a particular shot. No need to reach for the dictionary later, looking for the definition of bokeh. Here is a brief guide to bokeh for beginners.

Let’s go along with the Do-Re-Mi song from The Sound of Music and start at the very beginning: the word itself. It doesn’t look English and it most certainly doesn’t sound English. You would be forgiven for thinking it sounded like it was the latest Kabala-like craze sweeping the nation, maybe some sort of odd skin condition (‘ew, look at the bokeh on that kid’) or the name of one of the transformers. The word is Japanese in origin and literally means a haze or a blur. In Japanese the ‘h’ at the end is not present – it seems to have been adopted in English speaking circles to help with the correct pronunciation. If you say boke-aay then you are pretty close.

You have probably guessed by now that it is all about focus. Yes, but of course there is a little more to it than that. Who exactly coined the word in terms of photography and for the English speaking world (not to mention the added h) is hotly debated but the forerunner is one Mike Johnston who used to edit the Photo Techniques magazine. Boke had been in use in photographic circles from the mid nineteen nineties. The word with the added letter has been seen in print since at least the turn of the new century. Do not, then, feel as if you should have known this word already. In terms of the English words, it is very new. How marvelous it would have been, though, if Shakespeare had coined the word. “The quality of mercy is not bokeh”.

One of the big differences between photography and other forms of art such as painting or drawing is the issue of focus. When we, as humans, regard the world then our eyes see everything in front of us in focus, whether it is near or far. Historically that is how artists have mostly reflected that world back to us. Even though the person or object at the front of the canvas may be produced using sharper colors and more detail, the objects which were intended to be less prominent were generally still produced as the eye would see them.

If you do it purposefully, however, your eye can haze out the less important of those things that you see in front of you. The photographic lens can de-emphasize parts of an image, whether at the front, the near field as it is known or in the background. Different lenses on different cameras have varying success in this technique. Cameras with large aperture lengths are particularly adept at catching out of focus bokeh. Those with small aperture lenses usually simply soften the photograph.

The foreground and background of an image can be controlled by the F-number (one of a number of things admittedly). The F stands for Focal. Focal length is determined by how strongly a lens converges or diverges light, or in other words how much it focuses or defocuses it. The F-number is the focal length divided by the size of the aperture of the camera. The larger aperture creates a blurrier background.

However, bokeh is not just science and mechanics – it is also about aesthetics. Bokeh is defined by many not so much in terms of how blurred the background (or indeed foreground) is but how pleasing the overall effect of the blur is. When you appraise bokeh you should always ask yourself how pleasing the haziness is to your eyes.

The quality of an image can be enhanced with bokeh as it makes the subject of the photograph leap out of the picture and forces the human eye (with its focus on everything) to concentrate on that part of the photograph – indeed, that which the photographer wishes them to look at. Bokeh is hugely important for macrophotographers to capture and emphasize the detail of the tiny object being captured. What are the blurs behind the giant dead dandelion above? A tree in a field, of course. Yet bokeh makes the image front of field all the more attractive as it is so very much the focus of our attention.

Bokeh could almost be called a trick of the eye in some sense as it does effectively force the eye to focus on one are of an image rather than another. One could say that about virtually any photographic technique, however, from tilt shift to Chiaroscuro. Confused? Well, you are going in the right direction because it is all to do with something called the circle of confusion. This is a spot which a cone of light rays from a lens creates when it does not come to a ‘spot on’ focus when creating an image. When an area is out of focus then it becomes an image of the aperture. Most lens apertures are polygonal and that is why when you see bokeh, the shapes in the picture are generally similarly shaped. However, if you keep your camera set to its maximum aperture size then bokeh should appear circular.

The lens is all important in the creation of bokeh. The discs in bokeh can be illuminated uniformly. Alternatively they can be brighter near the radius or brighter near the center. This is all dependant on the spherical aberration of the lens and how it is corrected for it. This is an effect that happens when the refraction of light through the lens is increased. In ‘normal’ photos this would be an aberration, but in bokeh it is up to the individual photographer. In other words, the photographer may alter the camera settings so that the spherical aberration is poor to achieve his or her desired effect.

Of course, there is always the school of bokeh for bokeh’s sake.

Some argue that another Japanese word should join the English language lexicon. That word is pinto. It means in focus and it is pronounced ‘peen-toe’. Effectively, then, anything in an image that isn’t pinto is (or can be argued to be) bokeh. As the meerkat says, simples (British joke).

Ultimately the appreciation of bokeh is completely subjective. It is entirely up to whether you think an image fails or succeeds because of bokeh. To recap though, if asked what it is you can get away with saying that it the out of focus part of an image and in particular the characteristics of that part. Whether you like it or not, however, is always and completely up to you.

5 August 2011

Tourist


If you have ever been a tourist in a big city you will most probably completely sympathize with the everyman hero of this very funny animated short.

A tourist braves the bustling city streets as he tries to snap the perfect photo of New York only to find that the Big Apple seems to be a bit camera shy. In a city full of landmarks, there is always someone there to ruin his shot.

Action! Intrigue! Sightseeing!  Created by Matthew K this was the winner of the Best Animation Award at The Big Apple Film Festival in 2008. It also, unsurprisingly, made the official selection at several other film festivals.

The Chiaroscuro and Rembrandt Lighting

In order to achieve the beautiful contrast between light and dark, known as chiaroscuro there is a method employed by photographers – Rembrandt Lighting. Here, with some beautiful examples, is how it is done.

The Italian language is a good one from which to borrow phrases. The lilt of the language gives words sensual warmth that is so often lacking in the languages of Northern Europe. So it is with the term Chiaroscuro. As a straightforward translation it literally means light-dark. In art (and contextually for this piece, specifically photography) the term means the contrasting effect between light and dark that gives a composition a significantly different effect than had it been done otherwise.

The effect here gives a sense of volume. Chiaroscuro is particularly effective when it comes to three dimensional objects such as animals and the human body but is also extensively used in landscape photography. The lack of volume which can make so many photographs seem flat and lifeless is discovered in the use of shadow and highlight. This combination is often referred to as shading. Here the light coming through the trees not only gives the composition volume but perspective too.

In cinematography the effect was used particularly in the era of black and white film. Lit with supreme care, the distinctive areas of darkness and light created in films such as The Hunchback of Notre Dame of 1939 was no accident. Even today the technique is used to startling effect in films such as Sin City and Hellboy.

In order to capture chiaroscuro there is one technique in photography that is used to great effect. This is referred to as Rembrandt lighting. Although used overwhelmingly by professional photographers it is a technique that is not too difficult – or expensive – to create if you are just starting out or experimenting with photography. Rembrandt lighting is not always done in the studio, of course. At certain times of day, notably the golden hour of photography (see link at the end of the article) natural light lends itself to the Rembrandt effect.

If it is to be done in a studio, Rembrandt lighting is surprisingly easy to set up, given the wonderful effect that it can give. It is named after the Dutch painter who was famous for his use of light and dark. It is often used in studio portraiture and is achieved by using a single light and a reflector.You can see it faithfully reproduced by Flickr Photographer Sedeer above.

Quite often two lights are used but for the portraitist just starting out a single is quite sufficient. The technique helps to create images that look both natural but somewhat enhanced without making the picture look too posed or unnaturally lit.

The term was coined by Cecil B DeMille was back in 1915. He had borrowed spotlights from an opera house while making The Warrens of Virginia. He wanted to try and create shadows on film as they would appear in nature. Sam Goldywn, his business partner, was horrified when he saw the results – in some scenes the actors only had half of their face lit up (somewhat alike to real life). DeMille thought on his feet and told him that it was Rembrandt lighting. In his autobiography he recalls the reaction. “Sam’s reply was jubilant with relief: for Rembrandt lighting the exhibitors would pay double!”

The key light, to the side of the subject, is placed high. The reflector on the other side of the subject is placed at half the height. If the subject of the photograph is facing the camera at an angle then the key light must illuminate the far side of the face. What should be created, if the technique is done properly, is a triangular shape of light underneath the eyes of the subject. The chiaroscuro, the interaction of the light and the shadows should do its work on the other side of the face. The picture above was created in this way, with the exception that there was also a background light additionally used.

The effect can be subtle or it can be extreme. This is all dependent on the distance of the subject of the photograph from the light and also how strong the light from both the fill light and the reflector is. It doesn’t need to be done with proper photographer’s lighting either. The photo on the left was taken with natural light and a piano light on the viewer’s left. The second was done with a fluorescent light to the left in the same natural light condition.

Many professional photographers use these techniques today, among them Annie Liebovitz and Diane Arbus. In terms of their documentary photography, the chiaroscuro method is one which they adhere to as it gives quite stunning results, such as the picture above.

To read about the Golden Hour of Photography, please click HERE.